|
Methods of responding to doubts in Tasnim interpretation; A case study of revelation deniers
|
حمید احمدی1   , Seyyed Hamid Hoseini2 , Hamed Fath a2 |
1- PhD Student in Quran and Hadith Sciences, Department of Theology and Islamic Studies, Ha.C., Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Theology and Islamic Studies, Ha.C., Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran. |
|
|
Abstract: (166 Views) |
This study explores the fundamental challenge of revelation denial in contemporary Islamic discourse—a view that dismisses the possibility of legislative communication between God and man, and instead sees revelation as a mere human experience. Such a stance clearly conflicts with Islamic doctrinal foundations.
Adopting a descriptive-analytical method, the research focuses on Tafsir al-Tasnīm by Ayatollah Javadi Amoli, aiming to uncover his rational strategies in confronting revelation-denying perspectives.
Findings reveal that by employing a system of rational and scriptural arguments—including conceptual clarification, affirmative and negative reasoning, analogical examples, contextual analysis (sha'n al-nuzūl), and ethical reasoning—he constructs a cohesive framework to counter these doubts. This underscores Tasnīm’s capacity to offer robust theological responses to modern challenges and paves the way for advancing practical thematic exegesis with a focus on contemporary skepticism. |
|
| |
|
|
|
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
کلام جدید
Received: 2025/07/8 | Accepted: 2025/07/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Send email to the article author |
|
|
|
| Add your comments about this article |
|
|
|
