:: Volume 16, Issue 63 (winter 2020) ::
2020, 16(63): 139-164 Back to browse issues page
A Comparative Study of Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Professor Motahhari on Social Determinism
Mohammad Reza Azimi1 , Alireza Abdolrahimi 2, Faraj Behzad Vakilabad2
1- Phd student Islamic Azad University
2- Assistant professo Islamic Azad University
Abstract:   (1729 Views)
This article compares the theories of the great Islamic and Western philosophers, professor Motahhari and Rousseau on social determinism. The purpose of this article is to clarify the differences or possible commonalities in their views on social determinism. Therefore, this research has used analytical-descriptive method, using library studies and examining the works of these two philosophers, to study their arguments and foundations. The research findings show Rousseau's basics in the form of a triangle whose base is the originality of society. On the other hand, the principles of Motahari in the negation of social determinism are expressed in the form of five angles, in which the principle of nature has a fundamental role.
Keywords
Free Will and Determinism, Social Determinism, Professor Motahhari, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Destination.
 
Full-Text [PDF 351 kb]   (503 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: کلام جدید
Received: 2020/05/4 | Accepted: 2021/01/27 | Published: 2021/03/16 | ePublished: 2021/03/16


XML   Persian Abstract   Print



Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 16, Issue 63 (winter 2020) Back to browse issues page