|
A Comparative Study of Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Professor Motahhari on Social Determinism
|
Mohammad Reza Azimi1   , Alireza Abdolrahimi 2, Faraj Behzad Vakilabad2 |
1- Phd student Islamic Azad University
2- Assistant professo Islamic Azad University |
|
|
Abstract: (1941 Views) |
This article compares the theories of the great Islamic and Western philosophers, professor Motahhari and Rousseau on social determinism. The purpose of this article is to clarify the differences or possible commonalities in their views on social determinism. Therefore, this research has used analytical-descriptive method, using library studies and examining the works of these two philosophers, to study their arguments and foundations. The research findings show Rousseau's basics in the form of a triangle whose base is the originality of society. On the other hand, the principles of Motahari in the negation of social determinism are expressed in the form of five angles, in which the principle of nature has a fundamental role.
Keywords
Free Will and Determinism, Social Determinism, Professor Motahhari, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Destination.
|
|
| |
|
|
Full-Text [PDF 351 kb]
(619 Downloads)
|
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
کلام جدید
Received: 2020/05/4 | Accepted: 2021/01/27 | Published: 2021/03/16 | ePublished: 2021/03/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Send email to the article author |
|
|
|
| Add your comments about this article |
|
|
|
