|
A Critical Analysis of the “General Method of Modeling” in Humanities Methodology
|
Seyyed Ruhollah Noorafshan1   , Ruhollah Shakeri Zavardehi2 |
1- Phd student, Theoretical Principles of Islam, Univesity of Tehran, s.r.noorafshan@ut.ac.ir
2- Associate professor, Shiite Studies Group, University of Tehran, shakeri@maaref.ac.ir |
|
|
Abstract: (71 Views) |
The research issue is about examining the methodology of humanities, the application and validity of reason, narration and experience in the fields of humanities. In the meantime, the idea of the “General Method of Modeling” has been proposed, which claims that the humanities method should be modeled and implemented based on new epistemology and ontology. This research seeks to first explain and analyze the theory of the General Method of Modeling, emphasizing the foundations of humanities, and then show its strengths and weaknesses. Research Method: Documentary and library analysis. Research Findings: The theory of the General Method of Modeling does not consider epistemology and current philosophy to be Islamic, and instead relies on epistemological orientation and Islamic relativity philosophy. The jurisprudence of guardianship, the method of term multiplication, the method of definition and the method of equation formation are among the most important models of this theory in the methodology of humanities. Given the numerous criticisms against this theory, it seems incapable of achieving its goals.
Keywords: Methodology, Humanities, General Method, Modeling, Jurisprudence of Supervision, Term Multiplication method, Definition Method, Equation-Making Method.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2024/11/28 | Accepted: 2025/01/20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Send email to the article author |
|
|
|
| Add your comments about this article |
|
|
|
